kalam causal argument

Step one: proving the first cause.

#4-ways of arguments for first being.

1)Causal finititute

2)Grounding

3)Explanation.

(Does the universe have a fundamental explanation or not?)

4)actualisation of what.

#1 causal finitism.

An ongoing process cannot be completed.an actual infinite set is a completed set, which is not possible only it's potentially possible.

*"A collection formed by adding one member after another cannot be actually infinite.”

*If one cannot count to infinity, how can one count down from infinity?”

*It would be good to better understand the idea that intermediate and non-intermediate causes are different in kind and the former depend on the latter.

*Infinite bogies moving without push.infinitely long paint brush drawing monalisa.( Postponing explanation infinitely)

*1).If an infinite past is possible, one can finish counting down from infinity.

2).A task every prerequisite of which has a prerequisite cannot be completed.

3)Finishing counting down from infinity is a task every prerequisite of which has a prerequisite.

4)So, one cannot finish counting down from infinity. (By 2 and 3)

5)So, an infinite past is not possible. (By 1 and 4)

(10 rs example .)

*Why there is something rather than nothing എന്ന ചോദ്യത്തിന് there are something therefore something exists എന്ന് പറയുന്നത് വിവരക്കേട് ആണ്.(It's like saying dogs exists there for the universe exists,this is not even an explanation.)

* no explanation പ്രോബ്ലം.

Events to events What causes it to exist ?

*Why this type of a world rather than the other?Why these events..? It neither individually or collectively explains its existence .

infinite ആയി അതിനെ നിലനിർത്തിയ necessary foundational cause exist ചെയ്തിരുന്നു എന്നാണ് അത് തെളിയിക്കുന്നത്.

1. If an infinite past is possible, then someone could have been counting down from infinity and finishing today.

2. Necessarily, .if someone were counting down from infinity and finishing today, there would be no explanation for why they finished today rather than yesterday.

3.So, an infinite past is impossible.

1)If the past is infinite, there is no explanation why all the events in history happened when they did rather than a day earlier.

2)Everything has an explanation.

3)So, the past is not infinite.

Probabilistic argument for causal finitism

_________

Recombination (Aquinas?)

1. Given an infinite past, every possible combination of events would have happened. (A set of cards example)

2. If there is no necessary being, then one possible combination of events is there not being anything.

3. So, given an infinite past, either there is a necessary being or at least once there was nothing. (By 1 and 2)

4. If there was once nothing, there would still be nothing.

5. There is something.

6. So, it is false that at least once there was nothing. (By 4 and 5)

7. So, given an infinite past, there is a necessary being. (By 3 and 6)

*If there was an undifferentiated past time, then the universe's potentiality for change would have surely already been actualized? A changing world is more probable under causal finitism.

*പ്രപഞ്ചത്തെ വിശദീകരിക്കാൻ infinite past ഉപയോഗിക്കുന്നത് complex ആണ്.അവിടെ infinite number of events എടുക്കേണ്ടി വരുന്നു. first cause ഉണ്ടെന്ന് പറയുന്ന ആളുടെ തിയറിയിൽ ഒരു സിംപിൾ first Explanation മാത്രമേ വരുന്നുള്ളൂ.

*This universe's actualisation of what.infinite past means it's an actualisation of nothing.

*Nobody can say THERE ARE PENGUINS That's why something rather than everything.

*Something exists by infinite causes argument is circulr.one can ask why 3 turtles,also could ask why 5 turtles so also he can ask why infinite many 

#Grounded infinity argument.

1)Dependence Principle: Any total of dependent things depends on a prior cause.

2)No-Circularity: The total of all dependent things cannot depend on a prior dependent cause.

3)Therefore, there is a non-dependent cause (First Cause).

#No known infinite acutual things we confronts and which is an evidence for causal finitism.

Logical contradiction.